Jimma University Open access Institutional Repository

Immunological outcomes of Tenofovir versus Zidovudine-based regimens among people living with HIV/AIDS: a two years retrospective cohort study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Teshale Ayele
dc.contributor.author Habtemu Jarso
dc.contributor.author Girma Mamo
dc.date.accessioned 2020-12-15T08:35:44Z
dc.date.available 2020-12-15T08:35:44Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.uri http://10.140.5.162//handle/123456789/3701
dc.description.abstract Tenofovir (TDF) based regimen was reported to have better immunological outcomes. Unfortunately, there is limited information regarding the immunologic outcome associated with this regimen in Ethiopia, as its routine utilization in this setting begun since 2013. Methods: A 2 years retrospective cohort study was conducted at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, 346 km Southwest of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A total of 280 patients’ data from September 2012 to July 2014 was extracted from records from February 10, 2015 to March 10, 2015. Records were selected using a simple random sampling technique. Data on socio-demographic, clinical and drug related variables were collected; entered into EpiData 3.1 and analyzed by STATA 13.1. Mixed effect linear regression was performed to assess difference in CD4+ change between groups adjusting for baseline characteristics. The change in predicted CD4 count attributed to each regimen was also assessed by marginal analysis. P < 0.05 for slopes of the random effect linear regression was used as indicators for presence of association. Results: The mean (SD) duration of cohort follow up was 714.2 (69.6) and 708.8 (78.9) days (P = 0.753) for TDF and AZT groups respectively. The minimum follow up duration was 7.4 and 8.9 months for TDF and AZT groups respectively. Most of TDF (93.6%) and AZT (91.4%) groups completed their follow up, 5 (3.6%) TDF and 6 (4.3%) AZT groups died and 4 (2.9%) TDF and 6 (4.3%) AZT groups were lost for follow-up (P = 0.769). There was statistically significant difference in immunologic recovery between the groups (B = +34.08, 95% CI [7.8, 60.35], P = 0.027) over time. The predicted CD4+ count for TDF/3TC/EFV was (B = +347.65 cells/mm3 , P < 0.001) whereas that of AZT/3TC/EFV was (B = +281.54 cells/mm3 , P < 0.001). Conclusions: TDF based regimens have shown more efficacy compared to AZT based regimens though AZT based regimens are more affordable in low income countries like Ethiopia. However, we recommend further study with quality design to assess the prevalence of sub-optimal CD4+ response (net CD4 gain <50 cells/µl/6 month) in this set-up among TDF users. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Immunological outcomes en_US
dc.subject Tenofovir regimen en_US
dc.subject Zidovudine regimen en_US
dc.subject Ethiopia en_US
dc.title Immunological outcomes of Tenofovir versus Zidovudine-based regimens among people living with HIV/AIDS: a two years retrospective cohort study en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IR


Browse

My Account