A Comparative Analysis Of Indigenous And Modern Conflict Resolution Mechanisms In Sayyoo Oromo: The Case Of Seyo Woreda In Kellem Wollega Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to compare the indigenous and modern conflict resolution mechanisms in Sayyo district. To this end, the study employed descriptive survey design, which involves qualitative research approach. Important data for the study were collected from both primary and secondary sources. Tools such as key informant interview, focus group discussions, document analysis and non-participant observations were utilized for collecting primary data depending on the objectives of the study. Accordingly, Sayyoo district was selected through availability sampling. Then, elders, religious leaders, judges‟, expertise, Abba Gadaa were selected purposefully for the interview, and for focus group discussion. Then the data obtained from both primary and secondary sources were organized thematically and analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study reveal that the people did not immediately appeal to Jaarsa Araraa for their case but they would rather go to the police or court immediately after they get in to conflict. In addition, it is found that the structure of indigenous conflict resolution mechanism is missing its originality due to the weakening of Gada system in the area, interference of government through one to five arrangements in each kebeles; declining trust on elders of reconciliations, lack of effective enforcement strategy of jaarsummaa and society‟s perception to consider using modern conflict resolution as a sign of modernity. Moreover, this study also investigated some of the challenges of modern conflict resolution in the study area like wrong witnesses, excessive government intervention, delaying the case, lack of accessibility and vulnerability to corruption. With regard to comparison both mechanisms were analyzed based on moral value, bringing lasting peace, cost effectiveness, accessibility and evidence consideration. The study also reveals that indigenous conflict resolution mechanisms are more effective than the modern one in bringing lasting peace and are more accessible, flexible, participatory, quick, cheap and relevant. Generally; the indigenous conflict resolution mechanism was not given sufficient attention at the study area. Based on the findings, the researcher concludes that the concerned bodies specifically the youth, elders, practitioners and the government should give strong emphasis so as to preserve indigenous conflict resolution mechanisms and transfer from generation to generation as of the modern one.