Abstract:
Background: - In Ethiopia, one in five mothers suffers from postpartum depression. It
carries adverse physical and psychological consequences for the mother, child, family, and
society as a whole. Though the condition is an indication of the need for prompt
interventions, there is no assessment and prevention targeted to this problem at maternal
health care units in Ethiopia. Evidence indicates that, to prevent postpartum depression
(PPD), universal screening and psychosocial support to be undertaken in early pregnancy
to be effective. Pertinent to this, the WHO indicates that maternal health care providers
hold a crucial role in detecting, preventing, and, if necessary, providing referrals to mental
health care services.
Objectives: So, the study tried to improve compliance to antenatal psychosocial
assessment practice (ANPA) among maternal health care providers (MHCP) and assessed
the effectiveness of antenatal group-based psychoeducation intervention in preventing PPD
in maternal health care units, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Methods: - To enhance compliance with ANPA practices among MHCP, a pre-post study
design was implemented. Audit, feedback, and re-audit standard criteria were utilized,
alongside a team-based analysis of organizational barriers. Additionally, strategies were
identified to address those barriers. The Joanna Briggs Institute Practical Application of
Clinical Evidence System (JBI-PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) audit
and feedback tool were used. The study was conducted from December 2018 to April 2019
using four standard ANPA audit criteria from JBI-PACES for both the baseline and follow
up audits. All MHCP and 66 pregnant women, selected using the consecutive sampling
method, participated. On the basis of the results, the gaps and barriers were analyzed using
GRiP strategies.
The next objective assessed the effectiveness of antenatal group-based psychoeducation
(ANGPE) intervention aimed at preventing PPD while also enhancing postpartum
depression literacy and social support. A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted
using a parallel-group, single-blind, and two-arm intervention design with a 1:1 allocation
ratio. This trial took place from March 28 to December 1, 2022, and involved 550
IX
(intervention=286 and control=264) pregnant women across 32 non-adjusted health
centers. The health centers were randomized into two groups, with 16 health centers
assigned to each arm, using a simple randomization technique. The units of randomization
were health centers with an average cluster size of 20 pregnant women, 12-20 weeks of
gestation, who scored (0-9) on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The intervention group
received usual care plus five ANGPE classes, while the control group received only usual
care. A well-validated patient health questioner-9, functional social support, and PPD
literacy scale assessed PPD, social support, and PPD literacy, respectively. Data were
collected in face-to-face interviews at 12–20 weeks gestation and 6 weeks postpartum. An
Intention-to-treat analysis was used, and baseline characteristics were compared between
groups using a χ² and an independent sample t-test for categorical and continuous
measures, respectively. Finally, the magnitude of the intervention effect and predictors of
the outcome variable were analyzed by using a relative risk and a mixed-effect model
based on the objective of the study.
Result: The baseline audit result revealed a 0% compliance rate for all evidence-based
ANPA audit criteria. Lack of knowledge or training gaps, weak internal referral system or
weak linkage between antenatal clinic and medical or behavioral treatment services, lack
of locally validated tools for assessing depression in the antenatal clinic, client load, and
shortage of private rooms were identified as barriers. However, the post implementation
result showed that an average 91.5% practice of evidence based ANPA was applied as per
standards by working on the above identified barriers.
Regarding the cluster randomized controlled trial: - The overall response rate at the end
line was 92.9%. The results showed that the prevalence of (PPD) in the intervention
clusters was significantly lower than in the control group, with rates of 20 (7%) compared
to 74 (28%), P = 0.001. Additionally, the relative risk (RR: 0.25 [0.07/0.28]) indicates that
mothers who received ANGPE were 75% less likely to develop PPD than those in the
control group who received only the usual care. Additionally, after controlling the
community and individual-level variables, a mixed-effect analysis showed that ANGPE
intervention (65%; AOR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.13–0.99), social support (AOR = 0.04, 95%
X
CI = 0.01–0.15), partner emotional support (AOR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.12–0.51), PPD
literacy (AOR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.11–0.62), and self-esteem (AOR = 0.22, 95% CI =
0.11–0.47) were more likely to protect mothers from PPD. On the contrary, domestic work
(AOR = 9.75, 95% CI = 3.37–28.16), neonates with complications (AOR = 5.79, 95% CI =
2.04–16.45), and unhealthy coping (AOR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.06–5.42) exposed mothers to
PPD.
Furthermore, the study showed that mothers in the intervention arms were 2.04 times more
likely than controls to have adequate social support (RR=2.044, 95% CI: 1.684-2.481).
Similarly, mixed-effect analysis indicated that mothers in the intervention clusters (3.607;
AOR=2.136–6.090) had partner emotional support (AOR=1.61; 1.00–2.59) and get support
from their mother (AOR=4.25; 1.78–10.15) had adequate social support. However,
mothers with PPD (AOR=.057 (.02-.19)), unhealthy coping (AOR=.27), and loneliness
(AOR=.28 (.11-.69)) were less likely to have adequate social support.
Furthermore, the study demonstrated a significant difference between groups regarding the
overall mean PPD literacy score (intervention, 3.75±.46; control, 3.48±.46; ηp²=.07),
ability to recognize PPD (intervention, 4.30±.64; control, 3.94±.75; ηp²=.06), knowledge
of risk factors and causes (intervention, 4.03±.69; control, 3.67±.70; ηp²=.05), and access
to PPD information (intervention, 3.28±1.25; control, 2.01±1.13; ηp²=.21) at p=.001, with
marginal significance regarding self-care activities (intervention 4.37±.54, control
4.26±.50, ηp²=.01, P =.051). Conversely, there were no significant differences in
knowledge of professional help (intervention 2.97±1.13, control 2.83±.80, ·p²=.00,
P=.303), beliefs regarding professional help (intervention 2.67±.89, control 2.50±.72,
·p²=.01, P=.063), and attitudes towards PPD recognition and help-seeking (intervention
3.91±1.02, control 3.91±1.02, ·p²=.00, P=.586). Moreover, partner emotional support
(AOR = .1, 95% CI = .02–.17), unhealthy coping (AOR = -.14, 95% CI = -.22–(-.07)), and
multiparty (AOR = -.15, 95% CI = -.22–(-.08)) showed significant associations with
overall PPD literacy score.