Abstract:
Goats are important to economic and social livelihoods of smallholders in Darolabu district.
The study was conducted from October, 2010 to March, 2011 with an objectives to
characterize Hararghe highland goat breed in its environment, to identify breeding objectives
and trait preferences and predict body weight from body measurement. The district has been
stratified in to lowland, midland and highland agro ecologies for this study. Structured
questionnaires, focus group discussion, field observations, recording morphological
characters, body weight and linear body measurements were used to collect data. One
hundred eighty households were sampled at random and 930 Hararghe highland goats were
considered for morphological characterization by categorizing into sex and age groups in
different agro ecologies. Descriptive and inferential statistics were employed to handle
qualitative and quantitative data, respectively. The main effect of agro ecology, dentition and
sex were fitted to the model to analyze quantitative data. The result depicted that the overall
mean family size per household was estimated to be 9.68±2.95. The mean flock size of goat in
lowland, midland and highland were 34.0±32.02, 10.50±4.73 and 7.0±2.46 respectively. The
rate of change in inbreeding coefficient per generation when flock is not mixed in lowland,
midland and highland were 0.065, 0.2033 and 0.2165, respectively. Ninetyfive percent of
household in lowland, 98.3% in midland and 86.7% in highland fatten goat with finishing
period of 12.28±8.2, 12.71±8.87 and 12.31±8.59 month, respectively without significant
variation (P>0.05) among the three agro ecologies. White, brown and grey coat colors are
the first, second and third preferred colors for both sex with an index values of 0.38, 0.38 and
0.24 respectively. Mean age at first service of female were significantly (P<0.05) shorter in
highland than lowland and midland ant it were 14.1±5.6, 13.1±5.7 and 12.0±4.7 month in
lowland, midland and highland, respectively and the corresponding age for male were
12.8±4.8, 12.4±5.6 and 13.0±5.2 month, respectively. The average kidding intervals were
8.6±2.28 month in highland, 8.0±1.96 month in midland and 7.6±1.86month in lowland. Litter
size of 1.38±0.20, 1.32±0.28 and 1.36±0.35 month was observed in lowland, midland and
highland, respectively. Goat milking is practiced by majority of the respondents (90%) with
average lactation length of 3.6±1.4 month. Ninety percent of goat owners in the study area
practiced uncontrolled breeding. Conformation, milk yield and twining ability were ranked
first, second and third for selecting breeding doe with an index of 0.22, 0.18, and 0.17
respectively and the corresponding rank for males was conformation, coat color and pedigree
with an index of 0.28, 0.20 and 0.12 respectively. Disease, genotype, feed and water were
ranked the first, second, third and fourth constraints for goat production in the study area
having an index of 0.30, 0.21, 0.19 and 0.09, respectively. Sex, age and agro ecology had a
significant (p<0.001) effect on body weight and most of the body measurements. The mean
body weight, body condition, body length, heart girth, height at wither, chest width, pelvic
width, rump height, rump length, ear length and horn length for female goat were 23.74±0.21kg, 2.68±0.03,57.2±0.23cm, 66.6±0.23cm, 59.6±0.21cm, 15.02±0.18cm,
13.3±0.15cm, 63.7±0.19cm, 14.3±0.06cm, 13.04±0.05cm and 8.47±0.15cm respectively. The
corresponding values for males were 29.6±0.31kg, 3.04±0.04, 60.7±0.34cm, 71.4±0.35cm,
64.4±0.33cm, 16.3±0.26cm, 13.6±0.22cm, 68.8±0.29cm, 14.9±0.09cm, 13.07±0.07cm and
10.25±0.27cm, respectively. Most of the body measurements had positive and high correlation
with the body weight and heart girth showed the highest and positive correlation with body
weight. The prediction equation developed has showed that, heart girt is the body
measurement that has revealed higher explanatory power (R2
) to predict live weight. A linear
regression equations using heart girth as an explanatory variable showed a prediction
equation of (y = -31.42 + 0.83x) for female and (y = -36.21 + 0.92x) for males, where y and x
are body weight and chest girth, respectively. The goat production could be improved through
exploring the indigenous knowledge in husbandry practices and genetic improvement strategy
that considered producers trait preference, breeding objectives and active involvement of the
community. The traditional eye ball goat marketing practices has to be changed to live weight
based marketing to make the producers beneficial.