Abstract:
Land degradation is the most challenge in sustainable development. To overcome the problem
of land degradation that cause climate change and poverty in Ethiopia, exclosure is used as
strategy to minimize this environmental and livelihood threats. The overall objective of the
study was to identify soil carbon sequestration, socioeconomic impact of exclosure and
farmers’ perception on its role: the case of Gimbichu Woreda, Central Ethiopia. To achieve
this objective Gara Girmi exclosure area was selected from Gimbichu woreda. Soil samples
were collected from open land and 4 years exclosed land. Soil samples were collected by
auger and core sampler from the same landscape positions; replicated four times in both land
management(exclosure and open land) and two soil depts. (0-20 and 20-40cm) to determine
BD and soil SOC and finally to calculate soil carbon stock. Besides, socio economic survey
was conducted using structured questioner, focus group discussion and key informant and
analyzed by SPSS (version 20). The result showed that exclosed lands had significantly
(P<0.05) different from adjacent degraded open land for mean value of soil bulk density
(BD), soil organic carbon (SOC), and soil carbon stock (SC). The study showed that the
mean value at exclosure and open lands of soil BD, SOC, and SC were 1.03 and 1.23 g/cm3
,
2.40 and 0.96% and 49.38 and 26.2 ton/ha respectively. With regard to soil depth SOC and
SC show significantly (P<0.05) different in the first depth where as soil BD didn`t show any
difference as their mean value in 0-20cm and 20-40cm indicate 2.09 and 1.28% SOC,
1.11and 1.16 g/cm3
BD and 45.75 and 29.63 ton/ha SC respectively. The soil carbon also
highly stored in surface depth of excloed land (59.16 ton/ ha) whereas the lowest is stored
under the subsurface depth of degraded open land (20.07ton/ha) which indicate that the area
exclosure play a vital role in climate change mitigation by sequestering atmospheric carbon
in the form of CO2 in to the soil . Concerning exclosure impacts on socioeconomics’ of local
farmers; all respondents under exclosure land (74.4%) perceived that they were getting
economic, social and environmental benefits but all respondents (25.6%) from the degraded
open land replied that they didn`t get any direct economic benefit from their non-exclosed
land. The exclosure is on improving the livelihoods of the local community where they have
probably harvested about 2550 kg/ha/yr or 1275ETB/ha/yr forage grass and 1400kg/ha/yr or
840ETB/ha/yr thatching grass which used for fattening purpose and house shade respectively
or additional income by selling these products. Local community perceived exclosures
positively and are optimistic to the performance of exclosure. The entire respondents agreed
that the exclosure is an option for land rehabilitation and they obtain economic, social and
environmental benefits. Besides, most of the respondents from open land decided to expand
exclosure to the adjacent degraded lands. Generally, exclosure has a great role in climate
change mitigation by sequestering carbon in the form of CO2 from atmosphere and also
improve economic and social benefits of local community. Therefore, the local community
living in degraded land could be adopting the area exclosure practice from the present
studied area