Abstract:
Rivers are important pathways for the flow of energy, matter, and organisms through the
landscape. River water quality monitoring programs rely on biological, chemical, and habitat
information to make science-based judgments on aquatic life support designations. Of the
biological indicators, macroinvertebrates are those commonly used worldwide. The patterns of
benthic macroinvertebrate distribution are related to the natural and human influenced variation of
environmental factors. The main objective of this study is to investigate the response of
macroinvertebrates for habitat quality and human disturbances. A cross-sectional study of Physicochemical, biological and hydromorphological components of rivers/streams in Gilgel Gibe
watershed of the Omo Gibe river basin, were carried out during April 2014 to assess its ecological
status. Investigation sites were pre-classified into three landuse/cover zones, (Forested sites,
Agriculture and urban impacted sites). A total of 28 stations (considering the pool/riffle sub-habitat
status) were sampled. Macroinvertebrate samples were collected to provide a description of the
community composition at each sub habitat of the sampling site. Water samples were collected for
analysis of selected physicochemical parameters following water quality assessment protocols.
Habitat quality information was collected using rapid bioassessment protocol. Macroinvertebrates
were identified to the family level and water quality was analyzed using standard methods while
the habitat quality class was quantified using the qualitative habitat evaluation index(QHEI).
Multivariate statistical analysis and different biological indices and metrics were computed to
describe the macroinvertebrate assembledge.
A total of 2210 individuals within 46 taxa belonging to 14 orders were identified from the 28
sampling sites. The most abundant orders were: Ephemeroptera 31%, Trichoptera 18%, Odonata
15% and Diptera 10% represented by 14 families. The results revealed that Macroinvertebrate
distribution varied considerably with the change in anthropogenic activities and habitat conditions
in the study area.Upstream (forested) sites were found to have significantly better ecological water
quality than downstream sites based on indices and metrics. The sites most impacted by
urbanization, had the poorest water quality scores than Agricultural and reference sites. Decreasing
habitat quality resulted in a decline of diversity and richness of organisms. Sites characterised by
riffle-good and pool-good habitat conditions demonstrated high diversity and hence good
ecological water quality than the sites with bad habitat condition. Differences in the richness and
II
diversity of the macroinvertebrate assemblages were attributed to both habitat quality and land
use. This study highlights the importance of quantifying both local habitat and land use parameters
of watersheds in stream biological assessments to understand the response of benthic communities
to disturbances. In addition this study proved that macroinvertebrate based indices and metrics are
robust in capturing both habitat degradation and water pollution if used in regular monitoring
programs. Furthermore, this study indicates the need of action by land managers and policy makers
towards improving agricultural practices so as to improve the habitat condition of the rivers and
excercising integrated water quality management.