Abstract:
The objective this study was to assess the practices of Instructional Leadership in Primary
Schools of Mizan–Aman Town Administration. To achieve this objective, descriptive research
design was employed. With regard to method, the study employed both qualitative and
quantitative. Sources of data were also both primary and secondary. The primary sources
were School principals, teachers, primary school supervisors and members PSTA and KETB)
whereas secondary data were collected from official reports, organizational archives, policy
documents, school development packages and training manuals, official rules and
regulations, and organizational minutes. Population of the study comprised 28 government
primary schools principals, 5 education officers, 3 primary school supervisors, 42
department heads, 49 PSTA members and 96 KETB members. Seven (58%) primary schools
were chosen using lottery method of simple random sampling technique. Similarly, 64
(32.8%) teachers were selected by using lottery method of simple random sampling
technique. Three (100%) supervisors were included by comprehensive sampling technique
whereas 7 (100%) school principals were considered through purposive sampling technique.
Two (40%) educational officers were also purposely selected through lottery method of
simple random sampling technique. Thirty two (76%) department heads were taken using
census sampling although there had been schools where some departments did not have
heads. Questionnaire, interview, FGD and document review were used to generate both
quantitative and qualitative data. The data collected were analyzed using frequency,
percentage, mean, standard deviation and t-test. Based on the analysis of the data, it was
found that the practice of instructional leadership, generally, was weak. The results showed
that school leaders were not in a position to properly play such instructional leadership
roles as decision making, conflict or disturbance handling, monitoring or negotiator roles.
That is,instructional leadership was found not to be properly practised and fully implemented
in this regard.”It was, however, found that instructional leaders conduct classroom visits,
provide support for teachers and that they, to the extent possible, devoted to ensure the
instruction is of quality. The results also showed that poor motivation, lack of instructional
leadership skill, low awareness and weak readiness were among the major challenges of
instructional leadership with clear negative implication on the practice of instruvtional
leadership. Sharing of responsibility, provision of adequate resources, capacity building,
continous and close supervisory support could be among strategies to use to improve the
practice of instructional leadership. Based on the findings, it was concluded that instructional
leadership, generally, was poorly practised in primary schools of Mizan-Aman Twon
Administration. Moreover, it could also be concluded that, as there was a clear gap as the
findings indicated, prmary schol leaders did not fully implement instructional leadership.
Furthermore, the conclusion could be that the practice of instructional leadership is
entangled with different kinds of challenges like failure to provide prompt constructive
feedback, lack of support and many more. In view the findings and the conclusions, it was
suggested that creation of awareness through workshops, short term trainings, seminars, etc.
on basic activities and principles of instructional leadership for insructional leaders,
generation of adequate resources for the proper implementation of instructional leadership,
provision of incentives for instructional leaders, arranging experience sharing visits to other
schools that are believed to somehow perform better, organizing capacity building traingins
to instructional leaders are among the possible ways to address the problems and improve
the practice of instructional leadership in primary schools of Mizan-Aman Town
Administration. It is also recommended that further studie be conducted in a comprehnsive
way regardless of the level.