Abstract:
Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) are believed to have a vital role in poverty reduc tion, employment generation as well as economic development in poor countries like
Ethiopia. The Ethiopian MSE sector includes a diverse set of operators ranging from
petty traders to small restaurant owners; shoeshine boys to small shoe making enter prises; peddler in the streets to grocery business operators, etc.
Micro enterprises are the smallest, informally organized business activities while small
enterprises are rather formal businesses that fall under the purview of the country’s
legal and regulatory system. MSEs operate in all sectors -manufacturing, trade, services
(Fantahun, 2004) both in rural and urban areas. The micro enterprise is probably owned
by an individual, perhaps supported by one or two family members, engaged in income generating activity. It is likely to be a trading activity; selling food or clothing in street
stalls or making and selling handicrafts. There is likely to be very little investment in
fi xed assets and inventory investment would be minimal. Enterprise sales may not be
distinguished from any other kind of income the individual or household earns. These
“enterprises” may be quite unstable and if better opportunities arise or if costs cannot
be covered the individuals involved may move on. This situation can be based very much
on a “hand-to-mouth” existence. A small business, by contrast, usually has an existence
separate from that of the owner. The business may be incorporated or conducted as
a sole proprietorship. Continuity would be anticipated. There would be some level of
investment, if not in fi xed assets then in inventory. It is likely that employees would
include non-family members. One would expect business fi nances to be separate from
the fi nances of the owner and her/his family.
In Ethiopia, like in any other developing countries, medium and large-scale manufactur ing or service giving sectors and state bureaucracies could not create enough jobs to
absorb the ever-increasing labor force, especially in urban areas. A range of interrelated
factors contribute to this dismal situation. These include town-ward migration, popula-
10
tion growth, landlessness, structural adjustment policies etc. In such situations, MSEs
may be reported to by poor and unemployed people in both urban and rural areas as
source of livelihood. MSEs may therefore have a critical potential role in poverty reduc tion and economic recovery and growth