Jimma University Open access Institutional Repository

Experimental Investigation on Mechanical Properties of Concrete Using Different Sources of Water for Mixing and Curing Concrete the Case of Jimma Town

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mohe, Nejiya Sefa
dc.date.accessioned 2022-02-23T07:22:51Z
dc.date.available 2022-02-23T07:22:51Z
dc.date.issued 2021-08-20
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.ju.edu.et//handle/123456789/6445
dc.description.abstract Concrete strength depends on the quality of concrete-making materials selection. The concrete-making materials selection should satisfy the requirement stated in the standards. Mixing and curing water is one of the materials used and should be suitable for making concrete. The quality of water is important because impurities can affect the strength of concrete and lead to corrosion of reinforcement. The usage of potable water is getting more intense with the study area (Jimma town) which can lead to a reduction in potable water consumption. Hence, different sources of water can be used as a substitute for concrete mixing and curing purposes. In this study, water samples were collected from different water sources (potable water, river water, deep well water, and rainwater), and their chemical properties were conducted based on standard lab procedures to identify the constituents. The concrete strength of C-25 was prepared using the identified water sources, and testing was done for 7 and 28 days. Tests were conducted on cement setting time, workability of concrete, compressive, splitting tensile, and flexural strength of concrete. According to laboratory test results, the impurities observed in the identify water sources were within the specified limit as per the ASTM C1602. The initial and final setting time of cement using each water source showed an insignificant deviation from the control (potable water) and all are within the specified limit as per ASTM C 94. The water sources had no significant effect on the workability of concrete the range of slump all is (0-25). The compressive strength test results on the 28- days mark showed that the potable water has more strength with 29.5 MPa followed by river water with 28.8 MPa, deep well water with 26.86 MPa, and rainwater 24.69 MPa for the mixing part, in the curing part river water with 27.09 MPa, deep well water with 26.12 MPa, and rainwater with 25.4 MPa. The same source of water used both mixing and curing parts, river water with 26.6 MPa, deep well water with 25.7 MPa, and rainwater with 22.97 MPa. The results showed that the compressive, splitting tensile, and flexural strength of concrete mixing and curing with potable and river water at 28 days had been more strength compared with deep well and rainwater. Potable water and river water was relatively good for mixing and curing concrete around Jimma town en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Concrete strength en_US
dc.subject Curing water en_US
dc.subject Impurities en_US
dc.subject Mixing water en_US
dc.subject Water source en_US
dc.title Experimental Investigation on Mechanical Properties of Concrete Using Different Sources of Water for Mixing and Curing Concrete the Case of Jimma Town en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IR


Browse

My Account