Jimma University Open access Institutional Repository

THE COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON THE SUITABILITY OF CERAMIC WASTE AGGREGATE AND RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT AGGREGATE AS AN ALTERNATIVE FOR BASE COURSE MATERIAL

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mohammed, Kedir
dc.contributor.author Gudina, Oluma
dc.contributor.author Jemal, Abubekir
dc.contributor.author Geremew, Anteneh
dc.date.accessioned 2023-10-18T12:29:23Z
dc.date.available 2023-10-18T12:29:23Z
dc.date.issued 2022-08-19
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.ju.edu.et//handle/123456789/8674
dc.description.abstract The study aimed to assess the suitability of ceramic waste aggregate and recycled asphalt pavement aggregate as an alternative for base course material. An experimental research design method and Non-Probability sampling techniques were used. The comparative analysis of ceramic waste aggregate and recycled asphalt pavement aggregate were blended with crushed stone aggregate at different proportions by weight and their laboratory result was compared with standard specifications. The study results showed that the aggregate crushing value (ACV) for neat crushed stone aggregate (CSA) and recycle asphalt pavement (RAP) were 19.20% and 8.20% respectively and the blended CSA with 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% and 50% of RAP were 18.20%, 16.4%, 15.90%, 14.40%, and 13.10% respectively. Similarly, 24.32% - 12.06% for Los Angeles abrasion (LAA) and 18.50% - 12.60% for aggregate impact value (AIV) were found. The CBR test for different proportions of RAP (10% - 50%) blended with CSA was also conducted and an economically acceptable result of 104.20% was found at 30% RAP mix at 98% maximum dry density (MDD). Additionally, the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test result for 100% RAP at 98% MDD was 49.10%. On the other hand, the experimental tests were conducted on different proportions of ceramic waste aggregate (CWA) (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) which satisfy the principal mechanical properties of aggregate materials. The ACV result for neat CWA was 26.70% while the blended CWA-CSA aggregate was tested with 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% of CWA with its complement of CSA as indicated and at 20% CWA replacement of CSA test results were 21.60%, for ACV, 26.31% for LAA, 106.9 for CBR and 20.60 for AIV. For this investigation, economically acceptable results were achieved by satisfying the Ethiopian road authority (ERA) standard specification limit at 20% CWA and 30% RAP blended with CSA for base course construction material. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Base course en_US
dc.subject ceramic waste aggregate en_US
dc.subject recycled asphalt pavement en_US
dc.subject standard specification en_US
dc.subject percentage by weight en_US
dc.title THE COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON THE SUITABILITY OF CERAMIC WASTE AGGREGATE AND RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT AGGREGATE AS AN ALTERNATIVE FOR BASE COURSE MATERIAL en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IR


Browse

My Account