Jimma University Open access Institutional Repository

INVESTIGATION of MANUFACTURED SAND USED as a SUBSTITUTE for NATURAL RIVER SAND in CONCRETE PRODUCTION: a STUDY in JIMMA TOWN

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Disassa, Getachew Bosho
dc.date.accessioned 2025-03-27T06:15:18Z
dc.date.available 2025-03-27T06:15:18Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.ju.edu.et//handle/123456789/9434
dc.description.abstract The construction sector is rapidly growing over time, leading to an increasing demand for materials used in this sector. One of the essential construction materials was concrete, which was conventionally made using aggregate and binders. River sand was predominantly used as fine aggregate in concrete mixtures. The utilization of Natural River sand in concrete production depletes the natural resource of sand and increases cost due to the shortage of sand in Jimma town. This study was conducted to investigate the use of manufactured sand as a substitution for natural river sand in C-25 concrete production. Natural river sand and manufactured sand samples to be used in the concrete mixes were collected, their physical and chemical properties (alkali silica reactivity) properties were studied, presented and evaluated using, table, chart and picture. According to the experimental results, the alkali silica reaction did not expand more than 0.1% after 14 days ‘of immersion in a NaOH solution in a water bath; therefore, manufactured sand exhibited non-silica reactivity. Five different concrete mixes were prepared for C-25 concrete strength, with a water to cement ratio of 0.5 for both natural river sand and manufactured sand. Based on the laboratory test results full substitution of natural river sand compared with manufactured sand, yielded a mean compressive strength of 21.11Mpa at 7days and 32.61 Mpa at 28 days, while the mean, flexural strength at 28 days was 5.67Mpa, meeting the requirements for C-25 grade of concrete. Furthermore, the cost of producing fine aggregate from manufactured sand was 3,500 ETB per cubic meter, compared to the cost of natural river sand from Jimma town, which ranged from 5,000 to 5,625 ETB per cubic meter. Therefore, manufactured sand was less expensive than natural river sand. In general, based on the all laboratory test results, manufactured sand was meets the standard specification limits. Therefore, the construction sector should promote the use of manufactured sand as a substitute for natural river sand due to Manufactured sand offers greater economic benefits compared to river sand and can be effectively used in construction projects in Jimma town. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Alkali silica reaction en_US
dc.subject Crushed sand en_US
dc.subject Natural River en_US
dc.title INVESTIGATION of MANUFACTURED SAND USED as a SUBSTITUTE for NATURAL RIVER SAND in CONCRETE PRODUCTION: a STUDY in JIMMA TOWN en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IR


Browse

My Account