Abstract:
Ethiopia is situated at the area where the weather is complimented with relatively higher
amount of rainfall. This has given the country with enormous water resource potential.
Sustainability of water supplies is a key challenge, in terms of both water resources and
service delivery. The United Nations International Children’s Fund (UNICEF) estimates
that one third of rural water supplies in sub-Saharan Africa are nonoperational at any
given time. The objective of this study is to assess the factors affecting the sustainability
of rural water supply system in Dabat woreda rural areas by evaluating and comparing
functional and non-functional systems. The study was carried out in Dabat Woreda
located in North Gondar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. A total of 366 water supply schemes
were constructed. Fromthese water points, 269 were functional and 97 were nonfunctional water supply points. In four kebeles from112 water supply schemes Seventysix (thirty-eight functional and thirty-eight non-functional) among these systems were
selected by simple random method. A household survey concerning the demand
responsiveness of projects, water use practices, construction quality and their level of
satisfaction was conducted at 380 households. The result shows that differences between
the functional and non-functional system was the involvement of the local leaders. In the
functional systems, 45% of the local leaders were involved in the initiation of site
selection of the water points while 53% the local leaders involved in site selection for the
nonfunctioning systems. According to the assessment of respondent’s perception of the
participation of women in water development process and water committee, more than
57% of the respondents in functional and 69% of respondents in non-functional systems
are not members of the water committee. The field survey shows that 62% of functional
WSPs were initially fenced. In nonfunctional systems, only 25% were fenced.
Respondents confirmed that three-fourth of water points were never fenced and
eventually became non-functional. In the functional system 54% of the respondents found
construction quality of the system good, while 26% found them bad. For non-functional
system, 31% of them well constructed while one fourth were considered poorly
constructed. Because a larger percentage of respondents considered functional systems
had good construction quality as compared to non-functional systems, poorly constructed
scheme is more likely to become unsustainable.A general held belief that the community
involvement during initiation and construction of the water supply system is most crucial
factor in the success of a water supply system does not seem to be important factor in the
study area. Instead, the organization of the community by having an effective local leader
to interact with the contractor and Dabat personnel is important factor as well having the
means to afford the payments for maintenance for a water supply system.The level of
stakeholders’ participation in the project planning and implementation should be
increased to enhance the sustainability of the water supply points in the county.