Abstract:
The study aimed to assess the suitability of ceramic waste aggregate and recycled asphalt pavement
aggregate as an alternative for base course material. An experimental research design method and Non-Probability
sampling techniques were used. The comparative analysis of ceramic waste aggregate and recycled asphalt
pavement aggregate were blended with crushed stone aggregate at different proportions by weight and their
laboratory result was compared with standard specifications. The study results showed that the aggregate crushing
value (ACV) for neat crushed stone aggregate (CSA) and recycle asphalt pavement (RAP) were 19.20% and 8.20%
respectively and the blended CSA with 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% and 50% of RAP were 18.20%, 16.4%, 15.90%,
14.40%, and 13.10% respectively. Similarly, 24.32% - 12.06% for Los Angeles abrasion (LAA) and 18.50% -
12.60% for aggregate impact value (AIV) were found. The CBR test for different proportions of RAP (10% - 50%)
blended with CSA was also conducted and an economically acceptable result of 104.20% was found at 30% RAP
mix at 98% maximum dry density (MDD). Additionally, the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test result for 100%
RAP at 98% MDD was 49.10%. On the other hand, the experimental tests were conducted on different proportions
of ceramic waste aggregate (CWA) (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) which satisfy the principal mechanical
properties of aggregate materials. The ACV result for neat CWA was 26.70% while the blended CWA-CSA
aggregate was tested with 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% of CWA with its complement of CSA as indicated and
at 20% CWA replacement of CSA test results were 21.60%, for ACV, 26.31% for LAA, 106.9 for CBR and 20.60
for AIV. For this investigation, economically acceptable results were achieved by satisfying the Ethiopian road
authority (ERA) standard specification limit at 20% CWA and 30% RAP blended with CSA for base course
construction material.
